Contractors vs. Corporations

November 1, 2009 by Daniel DiGriz  
Filed under Grab Bag

The trend is corporations increasingly substituting contractors for full time employees. Besides not having to pay benefits, there is no unemployment security, fewer rights (e.g. medical Leave of Absence), and diminished job security. Use them and drop them – that’s the new mantra. It’s not just the economy, either, as though it’s coming back. There’s a fundamental shift, perhaps spurred by the economic crash, that’s changing the way corporations look at filling roles within the organization.

Mr. Elienberg wasn’t a Comcast employee, but a so-called independent contractor working for a separate company. This month, he sued both companies, for allegedly depriving him and other contractors of overtime pay and benefits by not considering them employees.The case highlights a perennial issue for employers that is gaining new prominence during the recession. Lawyers say employers are trying to avoid hiring full-time employees by tapping contractors, as workers seeking better pay and benefits turn to the courts. – [Wall Street Journal, Oct 19, 2009]

CHENGDU, CHINA - JANUARY 12:  Job seekers line...
Image by Getty Images via Daylife

Undoubtedly, this will result not only in the kind of lawsuit being levied against Comcast, but also we’re likely to see pressure from individual contractors to achieve the kinds of rights once associated with unionization – basic rights. To do this, contractors may soon be seeking alternative forms of representation – alternatives to the traditional staffing agency. After all, staffing agencies are essentially the tools of the very corporations driving these changes. They take around half of your income, ensure that you don’t rock the corporate boat, and respond ultimately to the demand not of the individual (you’re not their client, the corporation is) but rather act as yet another corporation in partnership with the very forces reducing worker status and entitlements.

It’s not that being a contractor is undesirable. But being a contractor with no negotiating power isn’t going to fill the gaps for the newly unemployed, and glutting the contractor forces is liable to drive down opportunities and bargaining power for existing contractors. What is needed is perhaps not to defend traditional employment – arguably the corporations are right – traditional pre-depression employment may not just be in decline or recession, it may ultimately be dead – we just don’t see it yet. What may be necessary instead is to elevate and dignify the role of contractors traditionally at the mercy of staffing agencies by replacing staffing agencies with something new – a kind of empowerment engine for free agents. Stay tuned, if you like. This is something some of us are actually working on.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
Bookmark and Share

Speak Your Mind

Tell us what you're thinking...
and oh, if you want a pic to show with your comment, go get a gravatar!

  • Reader Comments

  • Get Web Hosting or Domain

  • Daniel DiGriz

    • Bio: Daniel DiGriz is an internet marketing consultant with a variety of interests and broad experience in several fields. He's been engaged in writing and publishing for 27 years, corporate training, education, and instructional design for 17 years, and sales and marketing for almost 10 years. He started his first business at age 12, taught English for three years in South Korea, and ran a landscaping company for 10 years. Currently he is president of Market Moose, a limited liability company that helps small businesses create an internet marketing plan, which also operates MixMySite and UnusualRealEstateSites - sites for real estate professionals who want to do online marketing. Daniel also serves as Marketing Consultant for Free Agent Source, a corporation that provides services to independent contractors who want to negotiate successfully with major corporations. Daniel founded the Rules of Work blog during the onset of the mortgage crisis.
  • Get Domain or Web Hosting